Comments on Profile Post by glitch80

  1. Demenzia
    Demenzia
    if you bring up a proper alternative, i might be comvinceable. you can also bribe me with cookies and hot milk though.
    17 December 2013
  2. buttonsinpjs
    buttonsinpjs
    I had suggested modifying the power requirements for AE before 1.5 was release. I can't find my OP, but I think I suggested a 20x power increase.
    17 December 2013
  3. glitch80
    glitch80
    I remember that buttons, but instead we got wireless remotes with massive range, and almost no power drain, and quantum network bridges with almost no power cost. :facepalm:
    17 December 2013
  4. buttonsinpjs
    buttonsinpjs
    :facepalm:
    17 December 2013
  5. Neonbeta
    Neonbeta
    Suck it up. It was an alternative to have so we could get rid of logistics pipes. Not that it really matters anymore since we're apparently getting it back in 1.6...
    17 December 2013
  6. buttonsinpjs
    buttonsinpjs
    I believe we are annoyed with the fact that the current energy requirements for AE are so low that it is no challenge to run a large AE network.
    17 December 2013
  7. Neonbeta
    Neonbeta
    I not respond in concern to that. I was responding to glitch mention the changes to wireless remotes taking no power over long distances.
    17 December 2013
  8. buttonsinpjs
    buttonsinpjs
    As long as the cost to run the network is reasonably high. I don't feel that free long range remotes are that big an issue. IMHO
    17 December 2013
  9. glitch80
    glitch80
    Agreed. Having high energy costs would encourage players to build smaller, more efficient networks. I did that at my base, to lower server load. Most players need an incentive.
    17 December 2013