Stop building laggy bases

Discussion in 'Alice (Minecraft)' started by Talons1337, Jul 31, 2014.

  1. Brodolon

    Brodolon Edit post Abuser

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2014
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    57
    but if its limited to 1 chunk everyone will put there stuff in that chunk :(
     
  2. kerjava

    kerjava husky mix

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    25
    I never said it was limited to 1 chunk mine was just an example
     
  3. Pathaleon

    Pathaleon Forum & Server Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,014
    Likes Received:
    670
    That's the problem with the type of player that plays on industrial styled servers. They are greedy and competitive so they want stuff like chunk loaders to see who can obtain the most uu matter for example.

    That's the sad thing about Alice now everything is just a biggest and best competition.
     
    DoomCommando and Siioh like this.
  4. Brodolon

    Brodolon Edit post Abuser

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2014
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    57
    Still if it was limited to more than 1 people woul be sure to put everything the own inside of it.
     
  5. FuzzyHarpyBug

    FuzzyHarpyBug Has the memory of a dead goldfish.

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    60
    MOAR Chunkloaders!!! I've been seriously considering building a 1 chunk base next reset just because of the issues with chunkboundaries/chunkloading... I've also been looking into ways to keep the entire server loaded for my modpack, doubt it will be doable but maybe... lol
     
  6. kerjava

    kerjava husky mix

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    25
    ^^' some would yes and there nothing you can do to stop them
     
  7. LordRedstone

    LordRedstone Best Coder 2k15

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Messages:
    391
    Likes Received:
    73
    I think that when auto-mining was killed off, that put off most of the competitive players like wolfenstien19. Personally, if you visit my base on 1.6 ([​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]) you'll probably find it's the least laggy on the server, because a) I stopped playing quite earlygame because my partner did and I got bored) and b) becuase I haven't tried to get 1 million of everything.
     
  8. danthewolf

    danthewolf Fwuffy wolf

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    1
    And don't forget that it is a very bare bones base with pretty much nothing of value apart from a forge and basic TE items.
     
  9. xCromyx

    xCromyx Gamer With an Eye-patch

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    178
    1.6a Toni's base was about as laggy as 12 sheep.
     
    Tonius likes this.
  10. LordXyroz

    LordXyroz *insert ridiculously long title here*

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    30
    That is too laggy! Your base can only be as laggy as 2 sheep, new rule!
     
  11. Tonius

    Tonius 555 Eternal Server Error

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    392
    I couldn't work much on it because you made me work on RF jetpacks all the time (9'A')9
     
  12. xCromyx

    xCromyx Gamer With an Eye-patch

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    178
    So you're saying that I should get credit for jetpacks because otherwise you'd of just been a quitter?
     
  13. Ronen

    Ronen Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2014
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    21
    I'm actually glad you've touched a pond this subject. Because now I will build a more spread out base.
     
  14. Talons1337

    Talons1337 I am a build team

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    129
    But i never got high tech enough to ever even have a laggfest. Every single base I built was more or less manually operated and had few machines. I focused mostly on aesthetics.
     
  15. Siioh

    Siioh If you can read this, you're too far

    Joined:
    May 29, 2013
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    118
    Tell that to OB.
     
  16. Siioh

    Siioh If you can read this, you're too far

    Joined:
    May 29, 2013
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    118
    Well either way, if we're going to stop building FPS laggy bases, then it simply means spreading across chunks...even though with chunk loaders that would cause more server lag. If we're going to stop building server laggy bases, then that means keeping only one chunk loaded...although the difference would be VERY minor since you'd have the same number of machines causing lag.

    Lag, competitions, and trying to own a million of each item/machine is truly what it seems like Alice has become.
     
  17. Talons1337

    Talons1337 I am a build team

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    129
    I'm not OBT doe

    Spreading across chunks should not be an issue. Simply don't load all your machines.

    Make a few (see also: a lot of) large rooms for your base, and designate one or two to be chunk loaded, for important stuff such as AE and power generation, and then all your other unimportant stuff in the other ones. Perhaps have a processing room where you place a chunk loader when needed and remove it when done.

    Simple.

    And stop trying to get a bajillion everything!
     
    DoomCommando likes this.
  18. xCromyx

    xCromyx Gamer With an Eye-patch

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    178
    So here is the thing since we are not in the latest snapshots MC renders all blocks that are loaded; bases would have to be widely spread out to reduce FPS lag, which would subsequently reduce server lag as parts of bases would not be loaded. The issue however is people need their power system, farms, AEs, what have you. Glitch worked out a system to shutdown his machines and AE the problem was machines with items just sitting in them would cause lag. (back when we had GT.)

    The configs are being looked over and we are attempting to reduce FPS lag and bring up compatibility that way, however there is only so much the MPT can do. The limitations of your system is not our fault, and we understand today's economy is rough. But the nature of machines is if they are not maintained, upgraded, or replaced, support will eventually be dropped for them.

    This is not to say we don't care about everyone in the player base, but sometimes a mod renders poorly and there is nothing we can do, other times it is what people chose to use for their bases. For example opaque itemducts cause less lag, however some people like seeing the items move down the ducts. This is one of the things people are willing to sacrifice performance for because it looks cools, OB seemed to get a bit better when I replaced all the ducts with opaque ducts. Also anything that is not a solid block, is going to have a larger impact on your performance, this is a vanilla issue that we wont get resolved until the pack is in 1.8 +
     
    Siioh likes this.
  19. LeiserGeist

    LeiserGeist Gamer, Software Developer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    116
    I figured this would be about server lag at first but it seems to be more geared toward FPS lag, which isn't a problem for me.
    The only real effective way to reduce server lag is to not have everyone try to get billions of every item and have fifty of the same machine conglomerated together to do the same task faster.
    Mekanism helped that last part quite a lot by adding very scale-able tiered machines with speed and energy upgrades.
    Instead of having 30 TE Pulverizors to do one task fast, one elite factory with some speed upgrades does it even faster.
    Yet people are all like "omg remove mek it so laggie."

    Most automation systems I've seen around can be done exponentially more CPU efficiently by using different mods and smart designing.
    As a very basic example, instead of this (which I've seen plenty of people do, spewed items, loops, and all):
    [​IMG]

    One could do this (and get an exponentially higher yield than the previous setup with only like 5 mining upgrades):
    [​IMG]
     
    Siioh and LordXyroz like this.
  20. xCromyx

    xCromyx Gamer With an Eye-patch

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    178
    Mek has tons of rending issues, but I agree I loved the factory blocks most about it and would love to have it in our 1.7 version.