I keep hearing about a guy (at least I think it is a guy) named Eduardo Surita. Who the heck is this kid? Even Google doesn't seem to know.
He's a brazilian hoster, model and radio announcer guy... He's about 20 years old and he became "famous" because of his father, who hosts a comedy tv show here in Brazil... Nowadays, no one cares with him, people here don't even remember him but in the past, he used to be that kind of person that the teenager girls love... a blonde hair having fringe/bangs and stuff... He looks like a bit Justin Bieber, and now you may understand what I meant in "kind of person that teenagers love"... Most guys here say he is gay or something... I don't care to his sexual option, but i'm sure he isn't homossexual... I think it's all about jealous. All these young people who became famous are branded as gay. I wonder what difference would it make to everyone if those famous guys are or aren't gay. I see people spending more time inveighing someone or someone's behavior than actually enjoying their idols... Spoiler: Some pics of him: Spoiler: Some pics of the tv show hosted by his father: Well, I didn't mean to sound rude... I just tryed to explain who he is and it reminded me about the bias almost everyone have. If I was rude, I'm sorry! See you and sorry for the huge text!
The kid is known cause it's bieber 2.0 (aka: "came back, in worse") and just look the pics to know why his father's show is known -_- Poor sk89q and gretar123, why did they do that ?
argh.. I had nothing to do with it .. sk sends me a pic of some mexican guy saying.. U WUV EDUARDO and that started all of this
Brazillian, Mexican, English, American, French, Swedish... Aren't we all humans ? So finally, is that really important to tell his nationality ? (I didn't tell every country because there are 190 states in the world, sorry if your country doesn't appear on this list...)
No, but someone mentioned it and therefore it was wrong. So leaving the wrong information IMO is worse than mentioning the issue again.
You must be really good in debates: to turn arguments against you into such good arguments, don't you want to become lawyer, or even more, a political men in your country ?
Maybe I turned it into a good argument because it was a valid point, not because I was trying to "make it disingenuously look good."
I just quote myself because I were pointing to gretar that resaid exactly what I said, and so the quote were to "prove" it and also to make it clearer. But my question is: Why did you quote the message above your message ? You think we can't read above just to see who you are talking to ?